N.Y.
Lawyer Convicted of Aiding Terrorists
By
LARRY NEUMEISTER, Associated Press Writer
NEW
YORK - A veteran civil rights lawyer was convicted Thursday of
crossing the line by smuggling messages of violence from one of her
jailed clients a radical Egyptian sheik to his
terrorist disciples on the outside.
The
jury deliberated 13 days over the past month before convicting Lynne
Stewart, 65, a firebrand, left-wing activist known for representing
radicals and revolutionaries in her 30 years on the New York legal
scene.
The
trial, which began last June, focused attention on the line between
zealous advocacy and criminal behavior by a lawyer. Some defense
lawyers saw the case as a government warning to attorneys to tread
carefully in terrorism cases.
Stewart
slumped in her chair as the verdict was read, shaking her head and
later wiping tears from her eyes. Her supporters gasped upon hearing
the conviction, and about two dozen of them followed her out of
court, chanting, "Hands off Lynne Stewart!"
She
vowed to appeal and blamed the conviction on evidence that included
videotape of Osama bin Laden (news
- web
sites) urging support for her client. The defense protested the
bin Laden evidence, and the judge warned jurors that the case did not
involve the events of Sept. 11.
"When
you put Osama bin Laden in a courtroom and ask the jury to ignore
it, you're asking a lot," she said. "I know I committed no
crime. I know what I did was right."
Lawyers
have said Stewart most likely would face a sentence of about 20
years on charges that include conspiracy, providing material support
to terrorists, defrauding the government and making false statements.
She will remain free on bail but must stay in New York until her July
15 sentencing.
The
anonymous jury also convicted a U.S. postal worker, Ahmed Abdel
Sattar, of plotting to "kill and kidnap persons in a foreign
country" by publishing an edict urging the killing of Jews and
their supporters. A third defendant, Arabic interpreter Mohamed
Yousry, was convicted of providing material support to terrorists.
Sattar could face life in prison and Yousry up to 20 years.
Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales called the verdict "an important
step" in the war on terrorism.
"The
convictions handed down by a federal jury in New York today send a
clear, unmistakable message that this department will pursue both
those who carry out acts of terrorism and those who assist them with
their murderous goals," Gonzales said.
Stewart
was the lawyer for Omar Abdel-Rahman, a blind sheik sentenced to
life in prison in 1996 for conspiring to assassinate Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak (news
- web
sites) and destroy several New York landmarks, including the
U.N. building and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels. Stewart's co-defendants
also had close ties to Abdel-Rahman.
Prosecutors
said Stewart and the others carried messages between the sheik and
senior members of an Egyptian-based terrorist organization, helping
spread Abdel-Rahman's venomous call to kill those who did not
subscribe to his extremist interpretation of Islamic law.
Prosecutor
Andrew Dember argued that Stewart and her co-defendants essentially
"broke Abdel-Rahman out of jail, made him available to the worst
kind of criminal we find in this world terrorists."
At
the time, the sheik was in solitary confinement in Minnesota under
special prison rules to keep him from communicating with anyone
except his wife and his lawyers.
Michael
Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, said the
purpose of the prosecution of Stewart "was to send a message to
lawyers who represent alleged terrorists that it's dangerous to do
so."
But
Peter Margulies, a law professor at Roger Williams University in
Rhode Island who conducted a panel on lawyers and terrorism recently,
called the verdict reasonable.
"I
think lawyers need to be advocates, but they don't need to be
accomplices," he said. "I think the evidence suggested that
Lynne Stewart had crossed the line."
Stewart,
who once represented Weather Underground radicals and mob turncoat
Sammy "The Bull" Gravano, repeatedly declared her
innocence, maintaining she was unfairly targeted by overzealous
prosecutors.
But
she also testified that she believed violence was sometimes
necessary to achieve justice: "To rid ourselves of the
entrenched, voracious type of capitalism that is in this country that
perpetuates sexism and racism, I don't think that can come
nonviolently."
A major part of the prosecution's case was Stewart's 2000 release of a statement withdrawing the sheik's support for a cease-fire in Egypt by his militant followers. Prosecutors, though, could point to no violence that resulted from the statement.